<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Yours Truly Singapore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by Quantum</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-170</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t live for very long. The longest living person is 122 years -  a record held by a French lady. Hence the passing of knowledge to the next generation is very important. That is, education is the only way that humankind can progress into the next centuries or millennium.  We cannot afford to be so particular over which methodology to use, and waste our time experimenting with frivolous &quot;reinventing-the-wheel&quot; methods. Whichever method that brings the maximum results of achieving the learning objectives is the best method. And the best method can only be discovered on the job by the educator himself - by the experience and practice of solving the problem of teaching itself, and the process cannot be &quot;hijacked&quot; by anyone who thinks that he is the best and so can bull-doze his own way into other people&#039;s brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t live for very long. The longest living person is 122 years &#8211;  a record held by a French lady. Hence the passing of knowledge to the next generation is very important. That is, education is the only way that humankind can progress into the next centuries or millennium.  We cannot afford to be so particular over which methodology to use, and waste our time experimenting with frivolous &#8220;reinventing-the-wheel&#8221; methods. Whichever method that brings the maximum results of achieving the learning objectives is the best method. And the best method can only be discovered on the job by the educator himself &#8211; by the experience and practice of solving the problem of teaching itself, and the process cannot be &#8220;hijacked&#8221; by anyone who thinks that he is the best and so can bull-doze his own way into other people&#8217;s brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by trulysingapore</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>trulysingapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 09:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I see a difference between intelligence and wisdom.  He may be intelligent but he is clouded by his own arrogance from the truth or reality.  To the extent that he cannot see the truth or the reality, he is a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a difference between intelligence and wisdom.  He may be intelligent but he is clouded by his own arrogance from the truth or reality.  To the extent that he cannot see the truth or the reality, he is a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by Quantum</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-168</guid>
		<description>He is no fool, just a madman who doubts the existence of reality outside his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is no fool, just a madman who doubts the existence of reality outside his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by Quantum</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-167</guid>
		<description>He is no fool, just a madman who doubts the existence of reality outside the mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is no fool, just a madman who doubts the existence of reality outside the mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by trulysingapore</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>trulysingapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Quantum,

I like this part best:

&quot;Is it the business of science to make a complicated subject look simpler, or a simple subject look complicated?&quot;

Why on earth does the Singapore establishment worship fools and let them run our precious institutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantum,</p>
<p>I like this part best:</p>
<p>&#8220;Is it the business of science to make a complicated subject look simpler, or a simple subject look complicated?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why on earth does the Singapore establishment worship fools and let them run our precious institutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ways of Dr Always by Quantum</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/the-ways-of-dr-always/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Dr Always once said that objective reality does not exist. He said that knowledge is just a set of notes and agreements that result from groups of people coming together for a chat. I find this rather troubling. If there is no objective reality, what then are scientists studying and discovering about? Wouldn&#039;t  science break down if there is no objective reality, and every reality is just subjective reality, just a mental construct out of individual whims and fancies? What then are the laws of physics all about? Can it still be called science if it does not refer to the real world and universe we live in?

He also said that why not we call current &quot;K&quot;? Why must it be &quot;I&quot;. The problem is: if students graduated calling current &quot;J&quot;, would they be able to communicate with the international body of scientists and engineers at large? Sure , we can just call electrons &quot;ball-balls&quot; , but can we communicate with other people in this field of knowledge? How can we advance a field of knowledge if we do not have a common set of language to describe things? Is it easier to communicate with standard conventions instead or ad-hoc conventions? Can students connect their own theories with standard theories?

Is it the business of science to make a complicated subject look simpler, or a simple subject look complicated?

Also, Deng Xiaoping once said: As long as the cat can catch rat, why care it is red or white? As long as a student reach his learning objectives, why do you have to insist on only one method? Why can&#039;t we use an arsenal of methods?

Yes, the strangest of all, the soldiers employed to do the training was not themselves trained by this method. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Always once said that objective reality does not exist. He said that knowledge is just a set of notes and agreements that result from groups of people coming together for a chat. I find this rather troubling. If there is no objective reality, what then are scientists studying and discovering about? Wouldn&#8217;t  science break down if there is no objective reality, and every reality is just subjective reality, just a mental construct out of individual whims and fancies? What then are the laws of physics all about? Can it still be called science if it does not refer to the real world and universe we live in?</p>
<p>He also said that why not we call current &#8220;K&#8221;? Why must it be &#8220;I&#8221;. The problem is: if students graduated calling current &#8220;J&#8221;, would they be able to communicate with the international body of scientists and engineers at large? Sure , we can just call electrons &#8220;ball-balls&#8221; , but can we communicate with other people in this field of knowledge? How can we advance a field of knowledge if we do not have a common set of language to describe things? Is it easier to communicate with standard conventions instead or ad-hoc conventions? Can students connect their own theories with standard theories?</p>
<p>Is it the business of science to make a complicated subject look simpler, or a simple subject look complicated?</p>
<p>Also, Deng Xiaoping once said: As long as the cat can catch rat, why care it is red or white? As long as a student reach his learning objectives, why do you have to insist on only one method? Why can&#8217;t we use an arsenal of methods?</p>
<p>Yes, the strangest of all, the soldiers employed to do the training was not themselves trained by this method. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Day Rally 2007 by Curry and Cars in Singapore &#124; It Doesn&#8217;t Get Any Hotter Than This!</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/national-day-rally-2007/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Curry and Cars in Singapore &#124; It Doesn&#8217;t Get Any Hotter Than This!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/national-day-rally-2007/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Puff Bandit&#8221; by the media, he was directly accused by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the National Day Rally in May. He was accused, and is now convicted, of tax evasion. Seems he made about $1 million or so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Puff Bandit&#8221; by the media, he was directly accused by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the National Day Rally in May. He was accused, and is now convicted, of tax evasion. Seems he made about $1 million or so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avoiding two Singapores, remaining one family by spyer</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/avoiding-two-singapores-remaining-one-family/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>spyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/avoiding-two-singapores-remaining-one-family/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>You mean ST words can be counted? The main issue is why you make the decision for me when it comes to my money that I earn using my blood and sweat. It is like I put MY money in a private bank, the government also have some share of it. Dah!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean ST words can be counted? The main issue is why you make the decision for me when it comes to my money that I earn using my blood and sweat. It is like I put MY money in a private bank, the government also have some share of it. Dah!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We have to be different to survive, says MM by Daily SG: 8 Oct 2007 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/we-have-to-be-different-to-survive-says-mm/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily SG: 8 Oct 2007 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/we-have-to-be-different-to-survive-says-mm/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Discourse - Yours Truly Singapore: We have to be different to survive, says MM - Yours Truly Singapore: Good leaders can’t always be popular: President - mrbrown: Who is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Discourse &#8211; Yours Truly Singapore: We have to be different to survive, says MM &#8211; Yours Truly Singapore: Good leaders can’t always be popular: President &#8211; mrbrown: Who is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avoiding two Singapores, remaining one family by Daily SG: 8 Oct 2007 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/avoiding-two-singapores-remaining-one-family/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily SG: 8 Oct 2007 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/avoiding-two-singapores-remaining-one-family/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] change in twilight years? - The Universe Within: Hijacking the Debate? - Yours Truly Singapore: Avoiding two Singapores, remaining one family - Diary of A Singaporean Mind:  The Mathematics of Pension Fund Returns&#8230;. - Perspective [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] change in twilight years? &#8211; The Universe Within: Hijacking the Debate? &#8211; Yours Truly Singapore: Avoiding two Singapores, remaining one family &#8211; Diary of A Singaporean Mind:  The Mathematics of Pension Fund Returns&#8230;. &#8211; Perspective [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
